苏孝贞;王志军;

• 1:新加坡南阳科技大学国立教育研究所
• 2:北京师范大学远程教育研究中心

摘要(Abstract)：

在过去的十年中,远程学习研究的重点已从对"距离"这一概念是物理的临近还是分离转入到心理建构,例如社会存在。我们也见证了验证交互是否具有最小化心理距离的作用的研究在不断增加。但是这些网络交互研究因为缺乏严谨的方法,且对交互的数量和质量之间的关系过于积极地假设而遭到质疑。笔者认为对远程学习领域的交互研究应该超越单纯的比较交互的类型和数量,在设计、实施和评价在线交互研究的过程中应该采用更加严格的标准。本文提出了一个网络学习交互研究的设计-评价模型,该模型包括三个方面:交互的概念、教育-技术设计紧密结合和评价的效度与信度。希望本文将突出未来为提升我们对交互在远程学习环境中的角色的认识的研究中所要考虑的关键理论和方法问题。

关键词(KeyWords)： 远程学习;在线交互;交互性;设计;评价

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 留学基金委“2012年国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目资助”

作者(Author): 苏孝贞;王志军;

Email:

DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2014.05.002

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Anderson,T.(2003a).Getting the mix right again:An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction.International Review of Research inOpen andDistanceLearning,4(2).
• [2]Anderson,T.(2003b).Modes of interaction in distance education:Recent development and research questions.In M.Moore(Ed.),Handbook of Distance Education(pp.129-144).Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.
• [3]Barab,S.A.,&Squire,K.(2004).Design-based research:Putting a stakeintheground.Journalof theLearningSciences,13(1),1-14.
• [4]Beaudoin,M.F.(2002).Learning or lurking?Tracking the"invisible"onlinestudent.InternetandHigherEducation,5,144-155.
• [5]Bernard,R.M.,Abrami,P.C.,Lou,Y.,&Borokhovski,E.(2004).A methodological morass?How we can improve quantitative research indistanceeducation.DistanceEducation,25(2),175-198.
• [6]Chou,C.(2003).Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems:A technical framework for designers.British Journalof EducationalTechnology,34(3),265-279.
• [7]Clark,R.C.,&Mayer,R.E.(2002).e-Learning and the science of instruction:Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedialearning..SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
• [8]Collins,A.,Joseph,D.,&Bielaczyc,K.(2004).Design research:Theoretical and methodological issues.Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(1),15-42.
• [9]Driver.(2002).Exploring student perceptions of group interaction and class satisfaction in the web-enhanced classroom.Internet and HigherEducation,5,35-45.
• [10]Frick,T.(2004).Scope of knowledge created through disciplined inquiry.Retrieved January 19,2007,from http://www.indiana.edu/~tedfrick/typesofknowledgesept1.pdf.
• [11]Fulford,C.P.,&Zhang,S.(1993).Perceptions of interaction:The critical predictor in distance education.American Journal of DistanceEducation,7(3),8-21.
• [12]Garrison,R.(2000).Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century:A shift from structural to transactional issues.International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,1(1),1-17.
• [13]Gilbert,L.,&Moore,D.R.(1998).Building interactivity into Web courses:Tools for social and instructional interaction.Educational Technology,38(3),29-35.
• [14]Godwin,S.J.,Thorpe,M.S.,&Richardson,J.T.E.(2008).The impact of computer-mediated interaction on distance learning.British JournalofEducationalTechnology,39(1),52-70.
• [15]Gunawardena,C.N.,&Zittle,F.(1997).Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment.AmericanJournalof DistanceEducation,11(3),8-25.
• [16]Hillman,D.C.A.,Willis,D.J.,&Gunawardena,C.N.(1994).Learner-interface interaction in distance education:An extension of contemporary models..American Journal of Distance Education,8(2),30-42.
• [17]Hirumi,A.(2002).A framework for analyzing,designing and sequencing planned eLearning interactions.The Quarterly Review of Distance Education,3(2),141-160.
• [18]Jonassen,D.H.(1985).Interactive lesson design:A taxonomy..Educational Technology,25(6),7-17.Jung,I.,Choi,S.,Lim,C.,&Leem,J.(2002).Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement,satisfaction and participation in Web-based instruction.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,39(2),153-162.
• [19]Koschmann,T.,Hall,R.,&Miyake,N.(Eds.).(2002).CSCL 2:Carrying forward the conversation.Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• [20]Lockee,B.B.,Burton,J.K.,&Cross,L.H.(1999).No comparison:Distance education finds a new use for'no significant difference'.EducationalTechnologyResearch&Development,47(3),33-42.
• [21]Moallem,M.(2003).An interactive online course:A collaborative design model.Educational Technology Research&Development,51(4),85-103.
• [22]Moore,M.G.(1989).Editorial:Three types of interaction.AmericanJournalofDistanceEducation,3(2),1-7.
• [23]Moreno,R.,&Mayer,R.(2007).Interactive multimodal learning environments.EducationalPsychologyReview,19,309-326.
• [24]Northrup,P.T.(2002).Online learners'preferences for interaction.TheQuarterlyReviewofDistanceEducation,3(2),219-226.
• [25]Phipps,R.,&Merisotis,J.(1999).What's the difference?A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education.Washington,DC:The Institute for Higher EducationPolicyo.DocumentNumber.
• [26]Picciano,A.G.(2002).Beyond student perceptions:Issues of interaction,presence,and performance in an online course.Journal of AsynchronousLearningNetwork,6(1),21-40.
• [27]Scardamalia,M.,&Bereiter,C.(1994).Computer support for knowledge-building communities.Journal of the Learning Sciences,3(3),265-283.
• [28]Shin,N.(2002).Beyond interaction:The relational construct of"TransactionalPresence".OpeningLearning,17(2),121-137.
• [29]Sims,R.(2003).Promises of interactivity:Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning.Distance Education,24(1),87-103.
• [30]So,H.J.,&Brush,T.(2008).Student perceptions of collaborative learning,social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment:Relationships and critical factors.Computers&Education,51,318-336.
• [31]Spencer,K.(1991).Modes,media,and method:The search for educational effectiveness.British Journal of Educational Technology,22(1),12-22.
• [32]Stahl,G.(2002).Rediscovering CSCL.In T.Koschmann,R.Hall&N.Miyake(Eds.),CSCL2:Carrying forward the conversation(pp.169-181).Hillsdale,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
• [33]Strijbos,J.W.,Martens,R.L.,&Jochems,W.M.G.(2004).Designing for interaction:Six steps to designing computer-supported groupbasedlearning.Computers&Education,42,403-424.
• [34]Sutton,L.A.(2001).The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communication.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications,7(3),223-242.
• [35]Thurmond,V.A.(2003).Examination of interaction variables as predictors of students'satisfaction and willingness to enroll in future Web-basedcourses.UniversityofKansasMedicalCenter.
• [36]Thurmond,V.A.,Wambach,K.,&Connors,H.R.(2002).Evaluation of student satisfaction:Determining the impact of a Web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics.American JournalofDistanceEducation,16(3),169-189.
• [37]Vrasidas,C.,&McIsaac,M.S.(1999).Factors influencing interaction in an online course.The American Journal of Distance Education,13(3),22-36.
• [38]Wagner,E.D.(1994).In support of a functional definition of interaction.AmericanJournalofDistanceEducation,8(2),6-29.
• [39]Wagner,E.D.(1997).Interactivity:From agents to outcomes.New DirectionsforTeachingandLearning,71,19-26.
• [40]Woods,R.H.,&Baker,J.D.(2004).Interaction and immediacy in online learning.International Review of Research in Open and DistanceLearning,5(2).
• [41]Zhao,Y.,Lei,J.,Yan,B.,Lai,C.,&Tan,H.S.(2005).What makes the difference?A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness ofdistance education.TeachersCollegeRecord,107(8),1836-1884.