远程学习中学习资源的交互性分析Interactivity of distance learning resources
王志军;陈丽;陈敏;李彤彤;
摘要(Abstract):
学习者与学习资源的信息交互是教学交互的主要实现形式,也是远程学习中教学交互深入开展的重要前提和核心。学习资源的交互性反映学习资源支持教学交互的能力,直接影响着学习者与学习资源交互的效果,是评价学习资源质量的关键指标。本研究通过梳理和分析已有相关评价与分析指标,从学习者的视角出发,基于学习者与学习资源的交互行为表现分析学习资源的交互性。将学习资源的交互性分为可选择、可控制、可编辑、可评价、模拟会谈、自动反馈、学习指导、情境再现八个维度。研究中进一步明确了每个维度的二级指标和学习者的具体行为表现。为学习资源朝着更好地支持教学交互的方向发展提供理论依据,弥补了现有学习资源评价框架中交互性评价不足的缺陷,使得学习资源的交互性评价更具操作性,有利于指导学习资源交互性的分析与评价。
关键词(KeyWords): 远程学习;学习资源;交互性;评价;教学交互
基金项目(Foundation): 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目“开放网络环境中活动导向的混合式教学模式研究”(编号:2015SJD358);; 2015年江苏省高等教育教改研究重点项目“新常态下课程建设创新机制研究”(编号:2015JS-JG046)的资助
作者(Author): 王志军;陈丽;陈敏;李彤彤;
Email:
DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2017.02.003
参考文献(References):
- 陈丽.2004a.远程教育中教学媒体的交互性研究[J].中国远程教育(7):17-24.
- 陈丽.2004b.远程学习的教学交互模型和教学交互层次塔[J].中国远程教育(5):24-28.
- 陈丽.2004c.术语“教学交互”的本质及其相关概念的辨析[J].中国远程教育(3):12-16.
- 程罡,高辉,余胜泉.2014.基于真实用户评论信息构建移动学习资源的评价模型[J].现代远距离教育(1):43-53.
- 程罡,徐瑾,余胜泉.2009.学习资源标准的新发展与学习资源的发展趋势[J].远程教育杂志(4):6-12.
- 万力勇.2013.数字化学习资源质量评价研究[J].现代教育技术(1):45-49.
- 王志军,陈丽,韩世梅.2016.远程学习中学习环境的交互性分析框架研究[J].中国远程教育(12).
- 武法提.2009.目标导向的网络课程设计[M].北京:中央广播电视大学出版社.
- 杨现民,余胜泉.2013.生成性学习资源进化评价指标设计[J].开放教育研究(4):96-103.
- 尹俊华.1996.教育技术导论[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
- 张庆秀,王跃生,韩清献.2004.网络课程交互特性分析与利用[J].开放教育研究(5):32-34.
- net-based distance learning courses:Phase one-Framework justifica-tion design and evaluation.Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration,6(2),Retrieved July 23,2016,from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.733.301&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Becta(2007).Quality principles:for digital learning resources.RetrievedJuly 23,2016,from http://mirandanet.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/quality_principles.pdf
- Dron,J.(2007).Control and constraint in e-learning:Choosing when to choose.Hershey,PA.:Information Science Pub.
- El Mhouti,A.,Nasseh,A.,&Erradi,M.(2013).How to evaluate thequality of digital learning resources?.International Journal of Computer Science,3(03),27-36.
- Grover,S.,Franz,P.,Schneider,E.,&Pea,R.(2013).The MOOC as dis-tributed intelligence:dimensions of a framework&evaluation ofMOOCs.In 10th International Conference on Computer SupportedCollaborative Learning,Madison,USA Retrieved July 26,2016,fromhttp://lytics.stanford.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Framework-for-Design-Evaluation-of-MOOCs-Grover-Franz-Sch-neider-Pea_final.pdf
- Holmberg,B.(1981).Status and trends of distance education.London:Kogan-Page.
- IMS.IMS Common Caartridge Profile v1.0.Retrieved July 26,2016,from http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/ccv1p0/imscc_profilev1p0.html#0_pgf Id-1752945
- INACOL(2011).National Standards for Quality Online Courses V2.Re-trieved July 23,2016,from http://www.inacol.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/national-standards-for-quality-online-courses-v2.pdf
- Leacock,T.L.,&Nesbit,J.C.(2007).A framework for evaluating thequality of multimedia learning resources.Educational Technology&Society,10(2),44-59.
- LETSI.SCORM 2.0 Project.Retrieved July 23,2016,from https://letsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=82&Itemid=9,2008-11-30.
- Nesbit,J.,Belfer,K.,&Leacock,T.(2007).Learning object review in-strument(LORI),Version 1.5.E-Learning Research and Assessment(e Lera)and the Portal for Online Objects in Learning(POOL).Re-trieved July 23,2016,from www.transplantedgoose.net/gradstudies/educ892/LORI1.5.pdf
- Quality Criteria for Digital Learning Resource(2012),Norwegian Center for ICT in Education.Retrieved July 23,2016,from https://iktsenteret.no/sites/iktsenteret.no/files/attachments/quality_criteria_dlr.pdf
- of Rubrics for Evaluating the Quality of Open Educational Resources.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,16(5).16-38.